Přejít k hlavnímu obsahu

Přihlášení pro studenty

Přihlášení pro zaměstnance

Publikace detail

The Difficulties of Philosophical Advice
Autoři: Beran Ondřej
Rok: 2025
Druh publikace: kapitola v odborné knize
Název zdroje: Contextual Ethics
Název nakladatele: Palgrave Macmillan
Místo vydání: Cham
Strana od-do: 195-217
Tituly:
Jazyk Název Abstrakt Klíčová slova
cze Problémy s radou of filosofů Diskuse o povaze rady a radění, a zda filosofie má specifický obor expertizy, v němž by mohla poskytovat odbornou radu. rada; expertiza
eng The Difficulties of Philosophical Advice In the midst of a difficult decision, the one who needs to make the decision may remain undecided. One way of dealing with such indecision is seeking advice. Where? Consider examples of difficult life decisions: the decision whether to end life support to a family member in a vegetative state. Or the decision of what to do with a marital crisis. There are expert inputs into these decisions: medical professionals can tell you about the condition of the person in a coma and about the likely developments, and law experts can tell you whether a disastrous divorce settlement is likely. Do these inputs work as advice on what to do? It would be more adequate to say that making a good decision is markedly more difficult and less likely if one ignores this input. However, these cases can be construed as cases in which, while respecting the expertise, one can still decide in several different ways, and neither would obviously be right. If those who have relevant empirical expertise, without which a full understanding of the case is impossible, do not make the decision for us, on whose advice do we rely? Consider such advisors as our best friends, family patriarchs/matriarchs who have lived long enough to see and experience a lot, a spiritual authority (a particular priest, rabbi, etc., one trusts, as opposed to just any priest, etc., qua a priest, etc.). We seek them for their wisdom or insight, not for a statement ‘you should do X’, though they may quite likely say ‘you should definitely not ignore what the doctor is saying about …’ This wisdom that might shape the decision will probably be less of the kind of a normative recommendation (unless you are looking for an authority to bow to, to relieve you of the burden of decision), and more of words that will shed a new light in which you will come to see the situation differently, more clearly. I would tentatively argue that if there is room for philosophical advice capable of a comparable effect, it will have to integrate or advice; expertise