Univerzita Pardubice Fakulta filozofická

Univerzita Pardubice

Zaměstnanci
|
Studenti
English

Publikace detail

A Case for Moral History – Universality and Change in Ethics after Wittgenstein

Autoři: Hämäläinen Nora Fiona Karolina

Rok: 2020

Druh publikace: článek v odborném periodiku

Název zdroje: Philosophical Investigations

Strana od-do: 363-381

Tituly:

Jazyk	Název	Abstrakt	Klíčová slova
cze	A Case for Moral History – Universality and Change in Ethics after Wittgenstein	In this paper, I raise the question of how the tradition of ethics afterWittgenstein tends to neglect the historicity of morality, in a way whichis not representative of the complexity of Wittgenstein’s own thinking. Ianalyse a tendency towards one-sidedness in the preferred diet ofphilosophical examples, where focus lies on recognition of, and ethicalattentiveness to, a fellow person or creature. Although these examplesplay an important role in their own right, the overuse of such examples,along with a certain notion of “philosophical grammar”, detracts from ahistorically sensitive investigation of our ethical forms of life.	Wittgenstein; etika; historie; Cora Diamond; Stanley Cavell; Raimond Gaita; Peter Winch
eng	A Case for Moral History – Universality and Change in Ethics after Wittgenstein	In this paper, I raise the question of how the tradition of ethics afterWittgenstein tends to neglect the historicity of morality, in a way whichis not representative of the complexity of Wittgenstein’s own thinking. Ianalyse a tendency towards one-sidedness in the preferred diet ofphilosophical examples, where focus lies on recognition of, and ethicalattentiveness to, a fellow person or creature. Although these examplesplay an important role in their own right, the overuse of such examples,along with a certain notion of “philosophical grammar”, detracts from ahistorically sensitive investigation of our ethical forms of life.	Wittgenstein; ethics; history; Cora Diamond; Stanley Cavell; Raimond Gaita; Peter Winch