Přihlášení pro studenty

Přihlášení pro zaměstnance

Publikace detail

Socrates and Theognis on True Love
Autoři: Hejduk Tomáš
Rok: 2019
Druh publikace: článek v odborném periodiku
Název zdroje: International Journal of the Platonic Tradition
Název nakladatele: Brill
Místo vydání: Leiden
Strana od-do: 24-50
Tituly:
Jazyk Název Abstrakt Klíčová slova
cze Socrates and Theognis on True Love The study compares Theognis' and Socrates' concept of love: there is an ambivalence of love present in both authors in the form of a connection between the pleasing and the unpleasing, that is, on the one hand, devotion to the educatory harshness of the lover, on the other to his skill and cunning. To what extent is the ambivalence in Socrates and Theognis similar or dissimilar? The answer discloses a comparison of ideas about the functioning, the aims, and the meaning of love in the wider context of understanding the life and world of the two authors: such a context exposes the duplicity in Theognis, and the love of negation of unambiguous teaching about the proper life without painful testing. In Socrates, it is exposed to irony, to eternal ignorance and to openness to another and to god's world. Next, we contrast Theognis' limiting of another's duplicity (devotion and cunning) to a level between a loving and friendly relationship with Socrates' expansion of the loving struggle into every sphere of life, above all into the relationship of the lover to himself and those close to him. We explain this contrast as a decision between trust in reason and trust in love as the fundamental forces conferring meaning on human life. We show, however, that with Socrates it is not blind love but rather love embracing reason and overlapping divine challenges, while with Theognis it is not pure reason that is involved, but rather reason directed by the socio-political situation. Socrates; Theognis; láska; přátelství
eng Socrates and Theognis on True Love The study compares Theognis' and Socrates' concept of love: there is an ambivalence of love present in both authors in the form of a connection between the pleasing and the unpleasing, that is, on the one hand, devotion to the educatory harshness of the lover, on the other to his skill and cunning. To what extent is the ambivalence in Socrates and Theognis similar or dissimilar? The answer discloses a comparison of ideas about the functioning, the aims, and the meaning of love in the wider context of understanding the life and world of the two authors: such a context exposes the duplicity in Theognis, and the love of negation of unambiguous teaching about the proper life without painful testing. In Socrates, it is exposed to irony, to eternal ignorance and to openness to another and to god's world. Next, we contrast Theognis' limiting of another's duplicity (devotion and cunning) to a level between a loving and friendly relationship with Socrates' expansion of the loving struggle into every sphere of life, above all into the relationship of the lover to himself and those close to him. We explain this contrast as a decision between trust in reason and trust in love as the fundamental forces conferring meaning on human life. We show, however, that with Socrates it is not blind love but rather love embracing reason and overlapping divine challenges, while with Theognis it is not pure reason that is involved, but rather reason directed by the socio-political situation. Socrates; Theognis; love; friendship

Katedry

Ústavy

Často hledáte

© 2023 Univerzita Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice 2
Telefon: 466 036 111, 466 036 112, 466 036 113
Správce webu, RSS
ID datové schránky: f5vj9hu
Prohlášení o přístupnosti
Drupal web od drupal web Drupal ᐬrts