Publikace detail

CAN THERE BE HAPPINESS IN PSYCHOANALYSIS? CREON AND ANTIGONE IN LACAN'S SEMINAR VII

Autoři: Balaska Maria

Rok: 2018

Druh publikace: článek v odborném periodiku

Název zdroje: College literature : a journal of critical literary studies

Název nakladatele: Johns Hopkins University

Místo vydání: Baltimore

Strana od-do: 308-329

Tituly:

Jazyk	Název	Abstrakt	Klíčová slova
cze	CAN THERE BE HAPPINESS IN PSYCHOANALYSIS? CREON AND ANTIGONE IN LACAN'S SEMINAR VII	This essay shows that despite the psychoanalytic critique of the human search for happiness as futile and illusory, there can still be a positive contribution to the question of happiness from psychoanalysis. To that end, the paper turns to Lacan’s Seminar VII, and more specifically, to the Lacanian “sublimation” as “the happy satisfaction of the instinct.” Whether we can achieve a non-illusory kind of happiness through sublimation or we stay trapped in the pursuit of an illusory happiness depends on the extent to which we succeed or fail in the following two issues: 1. asking whether we have ceded on our desire and 2. accepting that no object of desire can ever be completely satisfying. Lacan offers two examples of a problematic relation to desire: these of Creon and Antigone; Creon fails to ask the question about his desire altogether, while Antigone asks the question but fails to accept that she cannot have it all. A critical reflection of these two cases can allow us to find a positive and sustainable version of happiness in psychoanalysis.	Feminism; Happiness; Ethics; Psychoanalysis; Civilization
eng	CAN THERE BE HAPPINESS IN PSYCHOANALYSIS? CREON AND ANTIGONE IN LACAN'S SEMINAR VII	This essay shows that despite the psychoanalytic critique of the human search for happiness as futile and illusory, there can still be a positive contribution to the question of happiness from psychoanalysis. To that end, the paper turns to Lacan’s Seminar VII, and more specifically, to the Lacanian “sublimation” as “the happy satisfaction of the instinct.” Whether we can achieve a non-illusory kind of happiness through sublimation or we stay trapped in the pursuit of an illusory happiness depends on the extent to which we succeed or fail in the following two issues: 1. asking whether we have ceded on our desire and 2. accepting that no object of desire can ever be completely satisfying. Lacan offers two examples of a problematic relation to desire: these of Creon and Antigone; Creon fails to ask the question about his desire altogether, while Antigone asks the question but fails to accept that she cannot have it all. A critical reflection of these two cases can allow us to find a positive and sustainable version of happiness in psychoanalysis.	Feminism; Happiness; Ethics; Psychoanalysis; Civilization

Search

Přihlášení pro studenty

Přihlášení pro zaměstnance

Publikace detail

Katedry

Ústavy

Často hledáte