Login for students

Login for employees

Publication detail

Mapping Moral Injury: Comparing Discourses of Moral Harm
Authors: Wiinikka-Lydon Joseph
Year: 2019
Type of publication: článek v odborném periodiku
Name of source: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
Publisher name: Oxford University Press
Place: Oxford
Page from-to: 175-191
Titles:
Language Name Abstract Keywords
cze Mapping Moral Injury: Comparing Discourses of Moral Harm Moral injury is a term whose popularity has grown in psychology and psychiatry, as well as philosophy, over the last several years. This presents challenges, because these fields use the term in different ways and draw their understanding from different sources, creating the potential for contradiction. This, however, is also an opportunity. Comparison between behavioral sciences and philosophy can help enrich understandings of harms considered not just psychological but moral. To this end, I provide an overview of the more influential writing of moral injury, mapping them into three broad discourses: clinical, juridical-critical, and structural. This overview then leads to a discussion of how comparative engagement among these discourses promises to expand on current theories of moral harm. I argue that such a comparison will demonstrate that more emphasis on structural violence will strengthen current understandings of moral injury, often understood in a more narrow sense to be a result of more direct, physical violence, allowing us to view moral injury as a result of institutional and social violence and injustices. morální zranění; trauma; veterán; násilí
eng Mapping Moral Injury: Comparing Discourses of Moral Harm Moral injury is a term whose popularity has grown in psychology and psychiatry, as well as philosophy, over the last several years. This presents challenges, because these fields use the term in different ways and draw their understanding from different sources, creating the potential for contradiction. This, however, is also an opportunity. Comparison between behavioral sciences and philosophy can help enrich understandings of harms considered not just psychological but moral. To this end, I provide an overview of the more influential writing of moral injury, mapping them into three broad discourses: clinical, juridical-critical, and structural. This overview then leads to a discussion of how comparative engagement among these discourses promises to expand on current theories of moral harm. I argue that such a comparison will demonstrate that more emphasis on structural violence will strengthen current understandings of moral injury, often understood in a more narrow sense to be a result of more direct, physical violence, allowing us to view moral injury as a result of institutional and social violence and injustices. critical theory; moral injury; trauma; veteran; violence

University of Pardubice

Other Parts

Map

en.mapy.cz

Services

Popular Links

© 2023 University of Pardubice, Studentská 95, 532 10 Pardubice 2
Phone: +420 466 036 111, 466 036 112, 466 036 113
Webmaster, RSS
Data box ID: f5vj9hu
Accessibility Statement
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Creative CommonsAttributionNonCommercialNoDerivatives